
The Supreme Court will hear the Judicial Review (JR) case regarding the lawfulness of the strike initiated by the Vanuatu Teachers Union (VTU) in May.
A conference was held at 8:30am yesterday between Judge Edwin Peter Goldsbrough and the parties involved, VTU and the State Law representing the Teaching Service Commission (TSC).
The court agreed that there is an arguable case and scheduled May 19 and 20 to hear it, said the VTU Secretary General (SG), Jonathan Yona.
Over 600 teachers who are suspended or terminated will still receive salaries and entitlements until the JR is resolved. This was granted in orders made by Judge Goldsbrough last month, following an application for stay filed by VTU.
SG Yona said many of the teachers have had their salaries resumed, with over 100 still pending.
The Ministry of Finance and Economic Management (MoFEM) confirmed that the remaining teachers will receive theirs this payday, he said.
With the 2025 academic year starting on Monday, SG Yona said the teachers will remain on strike unless a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) is signed with the Labour Department and the Ministry of Education and Training (MoET).
“CBA is the solution to a trade dispute.
“VTU will end the strike once the CBA is signed. If it is not signed, teachers will not return to the classroom,” he said.
“I am calling on all VTU members, including those who are not yet suspended, to remain on strike and not return to the classroom on February 3.
“I am also calling on the Provincial Education Officers (PEOs) to respect the teachers’ right to strike and not threaten them.”
Meanwhile, on December 12 2024, TSC and the State Law applied for leave to appeal against the interlocutory orders of November 28, which stayed the suspension and dismissal of some of the teachers, but their application was refused.
The proposed appeal focuses on an abuse of progress argument related to the earlier application for relief, which was refused on September 10, 2024.
In that decision, the court determined that the application was premature.
The court heard that since then, much has changed, and it is now clear that the disciplinary proceedings are based solely on the participation in the strike.
More teachers have been suspended, some reinstated, while others dismissed.
“In my view, seeking to renew an application based on a change in circumstances is not an abuse of process.
“Nor can the applicants be said to be judge-shopping, given that the same judge heard the further application…,” Judge Goldsbrough stated in the verdict of December 16.
“…Finally, the disciplinary proceedings are not interdicted, merely the suspension.
“The subsequent dismissals are challenged as final orders. Given that the first defendant had the option not to suspend pending the disciplinary proceedings, it cannot be correct to submit that the effect of the interim relief is to render the disciplinary proceedings themselves nugatory.”
While the appeal is refused, the application can be brought again before the Court of Appeal.
The counsel should notify the Registrar of the Court of Appeal before the February 2025 sitting.
SOURCE: VANUATU DAILY POST
