The defendant admitted having a sexual relationship with the young girl over a period of two years.
Justice David Chetwynd said that the sexual relationship was consensual in the sense that the young girl was not forced to have sexual intercourse with the defendant.
The defendant entered a plea of guilty to the one charge but accepted that the relationship involved more than one occasion when he had sexual intercourse with the girl.
The offences are said to have occurred before February 24, 2017.
That is the day the amendments to certain sentences were enforced under the Penal Code (Amendment) Act of 2016.
“As such the charge accepted by the defendant attracts a maximum penalty of 5 years,” he said.
“Had the defendant committed the offences after that date he would have faced a maximum sentence of 15 years.
“The defendant and the victim have now married and are the parents of a 3-year-old boy.
“I must confess I do not understand the maths of their having a 3-year-old child.”
Justice Chetwynd said that there are no particular aggravating features in this case and picked up the starting point of two years.
He said that the defendant is of good character and has engaged in custom reconciliation ceremonies with the family of the girl.
The young man has accepted his responsibilities to her and the child he has fathered, the two-year sentence can be reduced to 18 months, the Court decided.
The Judge then said that the final sentence of 18 months will be suspended for a period of two years.
The defendant will be supervised for a year.
“As I explained to the defendant in Court, if he does not commit any further offences in the period of two years from today he will not serve any time in prison.
“If he commits any other offence within the two years he is liable to be taken into custody to serve 18 months for this offence and any more time imposed for the new offence.”