Photo: United Nations Office

The Attorney General (AG) of the Republic of Vanuatu has addressed public concerns about the proposed two-gender law, saying that it should not be a cause for concern.

The law, according to AG Arnold Kiel Loughman, will define gender based on sex assigned at birth—either male or female—but will not interfere with anyone’s right to express their identity.

He explained that individuals who identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual (LGBTQIA+) are not committing any offence and are free to express themselves, as there is no law in the Constitution that makes identifying as LGBTQIA+ a crime.

The proposed amendment, which has received approval from the Council of Ministers (COMs) and is scheduled to go before Parliament on April 30, would formally recognise two sexes in law, based on gender assigned at birth.

By definition, “sex assigned at birth” refers to the initial classification of an infant’s sex based on external anatomy, recorded on the birth certificate. This term is often considered more neutral and inclusive than simply “biological sex,” as it acknowledges that gender identity is personal and may evolve over time.

A New York Times article by Alex Byrne and Carole K. Hooven, The Problem with Saying ‘Sex Assigned at Birth’, notes that clear terminology is important in matters such as health care. In medical emergencies, knowing a person’s birth-assigned sex can assist doctors in providing the appropriate care. Understanding the link between biology and gender identity can be relevant in both clinical and social situations.

The article also noted that the interaction between sex and culture is key to understanding psychological and physical differences between men and women—a discussion that connects with the global debate about trans women in female sports competitions.

One Vanuatu resident, speaking anonymously, reached out to the Daily Post to share his views on the debate. He believes the current move feels less about culture or theology, and more about using religion to exclude.

“The hypocrisy is stark. Churches and leaders often focus on LGBTQIA+ people while ignoring other common issues that are clearly at odds with biblical teachings—like domestic violence, corruption, or inequality,” he said.

“What hurts the most is how this affects young people who are already trying to figure out who they are. Moves like this push them further into the margins. And there’s irony in it too—Christianity itself arrived here through colonisation, yet now it’s being used to define what’s ‘real’ custom and what’s not?”

This brings up a question frequently asked in public discussions: if LGBTQIA+ identities are seen by some as a Western concept, then isn’t Christianity one too?

In the end, the AG clarified that Vanuatu remains a free country, and people are free to express themselves. His office’s core responsibility is to advise and represent the Government in legal matters.


SOURCE: VANUATU DAILY POST